Whining and Begging, Still Failing the Community

by lewwaters

Col MonkeyColumbian editor Lou Brancaccio has never hidden his disdain for blogs and bloggers and in years past has laid a portion of blame on blogs for the Lazy C’s declining sales and subscription rate.

But the reality of it is that newspapers and media in general have no one to blame but themselves for the decline.

Long ago many told Lou that if the newspaper were more even handed and equitable in political coverage, not promoting the left more so than the right, they likely would regain many conservative readers that walked away from their product.

His response as usual, “We already endorse about as many Republicans as we do Democrats.”

But, that is where they stop, endorsing.

What about fair and equitable coverage?

Although I concur with seeing County Councilor David Madore losing his bid for reelection, was it really necessary for the editor to focus half of his editorials since Madore was elected negatively on Madore?

And that does not include numerous articles and opinion pieces from others at the Lazy C, just Lou’s Press Talk editorials.

Have they ever focused so much on any single elected officials prior to Madore? Say, controversy surrounding Jim Moeller perhaps? Vancouver Mayor Tim Leavitt never received such long term negative coverage even though he blatantly lied on his stance of “No Tolls” in 2009 to win the election.

No, he only had to admit “I was wrong” and all was forgiven.

And then there is the curious endorsement of Democrat Monica Stonier in her first bid for 17th Legislative District Representative in 2010. In July 2010 they declined her the endorsement citing, “she also sings pitch-perfect the talking point serenades of the Washington Education Association, the teachers’ union. Stonier shows no inclination to force public employees to incur the same pay and benefits sacrifices that private-sector workers have suffered.”

By October they endorsed her citing, “Stonier has potential that could flourish into effective service” against the Republican running, Paul Harris.

Further indication was seen in the resignations of two separate politicians a few years apart. One a Republican, the other a Democrat. I personally challenged former Columbian writer Stephanie Rice on the disparity of the coverage of the two, the Republican seeing some 14 articles within a week while the Democrat received much less coverage over a month.

Ms. Rice said then, “…case was a completely different set of circumstances. (And there were not 14 articles in five days, at least not all from The Columbian.)”

Giving her the titles and dates from all 14 from their archives drew the response, “And sorry Lew, I didn’t know you were counting columns and editorials” from Ms. Rice.

Confronting the editor later on about the disparity drew a comment of “no paper trail” from Lou.

So much for his claim today of “But real news, stuff you have to dig for? That’s us. We do it.”

Yes, they do dig deep and hard at times. But as we have all too often seen, not all of the time and many stories the public deserves to hear would go unreported, if not for citizens also going out at times and “digging” for information.

Another case in point would be the slanted coverage regarding the comatose Columbia River Crossing light rail project over several years. Even though public opinion remained largely opposed to forcing us into accepting Portland’s financially ailing light rail just a few blocks into our community, at a multi-Billion dollar cost, the Lazy C saw fit to label citizens “Hounds of Whinerville” from former Political page editor John Laird and even editor Brancaccio chiming in once, “It’s an ugly baby, but it’s ours.”

Fortunately and in agreement with Lou’s assessment of the real necessity of newspapers, other newspapers such as the Willamette Week saw fit to do more of that “heavy lifting” in “digging deep” into the truth about the CRC that the Lazy C declined to address.

Instead of owning up to shortcomings and attempting to make reasonable corrections, we see Lou’s latest Press Talk, Life without newspapers? once again return to taking cheap shots at bloggers, boasting of the newspapers worth and all but dropping to his knees to beg people to subscribe.

Here’s the thing Lou. People are reluctant to pay for a product they feel is not worth it.

Much like soon to be former County Councilor David Madore lashing out at people that openly opposed his reelection bid, you now do the same thing by pointing fingers in every direction and denying what the public, the potential subscribers perceive.

BIAS!

Madore lost because he alienated a large segment of the voters. And yes, even though overkill, your excessive editorials contributed to that.

But still, his actions turned many former supporters against him.

In the same regard, your editorials and reluctance to “dig deep” when the subject may be a Democrat and focus primarily on Republicans or Conservatives has alienated a large segment of the citizens within Southwest Washington.

You must be willing to go after both sides with as much zeal as possible if you wish people to subscribe.

No one is willing to pay for daily reminders of how awful they are for holding the values they hold.

Unlike some others, I neither foresee nor desire the complete demise of newspapers. I desire to see more fair and equitable coverage regarding the political parties.

And that is where reputable bloggers come in. Most operate free of charge and also “dig deep” for stories and yes, often link back to newspaper stories.

But you neglect to mention that often linking back is to show a fallacy on the part of the newspaper or provide a view the newspaper is unwilling to provide.

You see, Lou. Many began blogging to give interested readers a different perspective more in line with their personal values that your paper has long failed to provide.

In effect, where you claim to be “holding politicians feet to the fire,” we that blog are doing our job of holding YOUR feet to the fire.

Beg away as you wish, but you will never gain the subscribers you want until you offer them the product they seek and deserve.

Finally, if blogs are so nonessential and hold little to no value for the public, one must ask, just why is it that the Columbian set up and operates their own blogs?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Help keep this blog active with a voluntary contribution at the PayPal button at the top of the sidebar on the right. Thank you.

%d bloggers like this: